Thursday 14 February 2013

Cynicism underlies officials' lack of respect for dead


A landslide last month in southwestern China killed 46 villagers. Once the bodies were uncovered, the local authorities cremated them without getting prior agreement from family members.

This caused a storm of protest and criticism from relatives of the deceased, as well as from the public. Authorities in Zhenxiong County, Yunnan Province, sparked further outrage when they admitted that the cremations were prompted by a desire to maintain stability.

That one's family member dies in a disaster is devastating enough. The fact that the local government went ahead with such a decision and deprived the families the chance to send their loved ones off properly is salt in the wound. Such a method of "maintaining stability" can only make matters worse.

So why are local officials so thoughtless?

In fact, they had carefully calculated their own interests in making this decision. They must have been afraid of the families "using the dead to press the living," thinking they might react irrationally when they actually saw the horrible state of their excavated loved ones.

On the contrary, especially from a long term point of view, this kind of behavior hurts the feelings of the families of the deceased, threatens public order and undermines good morals. It makes the already poor credibility of the government even worse. Unfortunately, we see this kind of thing repeatedly in China.

Just as unfortunate, "using the dead to press the living" is often the last remedy the weak have to act against the strong.

Take a custom in my hometown in the central province of Hunan as an example. When a woman killed herself due to family disputes, her clan gathered to prevent her body from being buried in the hopes such a scene would ruin the husband's family.

This is, of course, illegal and not worth promoting. However, when one considers the historical background of the custom, one may understand and feel more sympathy.

For starters, in traditional Chinese society, women have a very low status. It's not rare that women suffer abuse from their mothers-in-law or violence from their husbands. The protection of a woman thus depends not on the law, but on the forces that her family can muster. It is very difficult to expect the law to uphold justice when a woman commits suicide because of domestic violence. This is why her family clan creates havoc as a way to punish the husband's family.

Respect the Dead

From the viewpoint of the modern rule of law, this kind of practice is primitive, a type of vigilante justice. But under specific historical circumstances, the approach does have a deterrent effect and to a certain extent curbs the ill-treatment of women.

So why is it that the practice of taking the dead to press the living still goes on? The most basic element of a civilized society is to respect the dead. Respecting the deceased is respecting the value of life.

A while ago, various local governments in Henan Province implemented by force a policy of flattening tombs. Like others, I believe this is because to those officials the skeletons are just meaningless waste. The fact that that waste has to give way to economic development has broken the bottom line of civilization.

Naturally, funerals and the handling of bodies can evolve in accordance with economic and social changes. For instance, cremation can take the place of burial. But the premise of respect for the deceased is not to be denied. This implies respecting the deceased's will and, in some cases, his or her religion.

All civilized societies respect the dead. If the rules made by the powers-that-be of the living world breach such rules of civility for mere utilitarian purposes, then it's doomed to face revolt.

Far too often, local authorities in China try to settle conflicts in the quickest possible way, fearing neither financial costs nor social taboos, for the sole purpose of maintaining stability. Such a cynical way of ruling must come to an end.

Thursday 14 February 2013

http://english.caixin.com/2013-02-08/100490853.html

0 comments:

Post a Comment